Data 2026-11-01 05:35 · USD/CNY 6.67
中文← Sinan Lab › Relay site comparisons › apiok.cc vs hohoapi.com
Relay site comparisons
apiok.cc vs hohoapi.com
As of 2026-11-01, apiok.cc and hohoapi.com both sell 9 mainstream models: apiok.cc has the lower effective price on 9, hohoapi.com on 0, and 0 are about the same. Across these shared models, apiok.cc's median effective price is 15% of reference and hohoapi.com's is 58%.
Effective = the listed price converted into real dollars at the site's top-up rate and FX, per million output tokens. We make no recommendation; we just put both sites' measurements side by side.
Facts for both sites
| apiok.cc | hohoapi.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Price profile | Ultra-low | Near public price |
| Median effective price of mainstream models (vs reference) | 15% (17 mainstream) | 58% (9 mainstream) |
| Models with quotes | 32 | 452 |
| Top-up rate | Not exposed | ¥3.00 per $1 |
| Group used for pricing | default ×1.00 | default ×1.00 |
| 24-hour reachability | 100% | 100% |
| Median time to first byte | 3174 ms | 1632 ms |
| New-user sign-up | Open | Open |
| Panel | one-api/new-api | one-api |
| First indexed | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-05 |
Mainstream models sold by both · 9
$ per million output tokens; small print is the listed price (site credits, unconverted).
| Model | apiok.cc | hohoapi.com | Reference price | Lower effective price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 4.50listed $30.00 | 17.99listed $40.00 | 20.00 | apiok.cc lower by 75% |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | 1.80listed $12.00 | 8.10listed $18.00 | 12.00 | apiok.cc lower by 78% |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 3.75listed $25.00 | 14.62listed $32.50 | 25.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
| Claude Opus 4.6 | 3.75listed $25.00 | 14.62listed $32.50 | 25.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
| Claude Opus 4.7 | 3.75listed $25.00 | 14.62listed $32.50 | 25.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 2.25listed $15.00 | 8.77listed $19.50 | 15.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | 1.50listed $10.00 | 5.85listed $13.00 | 10.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
| Claude Fable 5 | 7.50listed $50.00 | 29.24listed $65.00 | 50.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0.750listed $5.00 | 2.92listed $6.50 | 5.00 | apiok.cc lower by 74% |
This is an arithmetic ratio. It is not an accusation against the vendor, and a lower public source not yet indexed here may exist.
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, apiok.cc or hohoapi.com?
- It depends on the model. Of the 9 mainstream models both sell, apiok.cc is lower on 9 (e.g. GPT-5.6 Sol、GPT-5.6 Terra、Claude Opus 4.8), hohoapi.com is lower on 0, and 0 are about the same. We only show effective prices and make no recommendation.
- How are the effective prices at apiok.cc and hohoapi.com calculated?
- Effective = listed price × group multiplier × top-up rate ÷ FX (today 6.67). apiok.cc: top-up rate Not exposed, group default ×1.00; hohoapi.com: top-up rate ¥3.00 per $1, group default ×1.00. A site's own page may show a member-group price by default.
- Which is easier to reach, apiok.cc or hohoapi.com?
- Our probes over the last 24 hours: apiok.cc reachable 100%, median time to first byte 3174 ms; hohoapi.com reachable 100%, median time to first byte 1632 ms. Reachability only says whether it can be reached, not model quality.
- Can you still sign up at both sites?
- apiok.cc: Open; hohoapi.com: Open.
- How often is this data updated?
- Panel prices are fetched daily and reachability is probed hourly; every price can be traced to a fetch snapshot on each site's page.
More comparisonsapiok.cc vs runapi.coapiok.cc vs aigcbest.topapiok.cc vs apidock.aiapiok.cc vs runapi.hostapiok.cc vs apilio.aiapiok.cc vs cherryin.netapiok.cc vs gptapi.asiaapiok.cc vs magic666.tophohoapi.com vs runapi.cohohoapi.com vs aigcbest.tophohoapi.com vs apidock.aihohoapi.com vs runapi.hosthohoapi.com vs apilio.aiAll comparisons →
One email a week
Subscribe to the Sinan weekly
This week's rankings, the price index, mainstream price changes, newly indexed and unreachable sites. Measurements only, no recommendations; unsubscribe any time.
Clear direction, grounded judgement.