Data 2026-11-01 05:35 · USD/CNY 6.67
中文← Sinan Lab › Relay site comparisons › apidock.ai vs brocod.ing
Relay site comparisons
apidock.ai vs brocod.ing
As of 2026-11-01, apidock.ai and brocod.ing both sell 5 mainstream models: apidock.ai has the lower effective price on 0, brocod.ing on 5, and 0 are about the same. Across these shared models, apidock.ai's median effective price is 36% of reference and brocod.ing's is 2.4%.
Effective = the listed price converted into real dollars at the site's top-up rate and FX, per million output tokens. We make no recommendation; we just put both sites' measurements side by side.
Facts for both sites
| apidock.ai | brocod.ing | |
|---|---|---|
| Price profile | Below bulk discount | Ultra-low |
| Median effective price of mainstream models (vs reference) | 31% (11 mainstream) | 7.2% (15 mainstream) |
| Models with quotes | 13 | 19 |
| Top-up rate | ¥6.80 per $1 | ¥7.30 per $1 |
| Group used for pricing | default ×1.00 | default ×1.00 |
| 24-hour reachability | 100% | 100% |
| Median time to first byte | 1493 ms | 2223 ms |
| New-user sign-up | Open | Open |
| Panel | one-api | one-api/new-api |
| First indexed | 2026-09-05 | 2026-09-05 |
Mainstream models sold by both · 5
$ per million output tokens; small print is the listed price (site credits, unconverted).
| Model | apidock.ai | brocod.ing | Reference price | Lower effective price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.20listed $10.00 | 1.45listed $1.32 | 20.00 | brocod.ing lower by 86% |
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 17.84listed $17.50 | 2.86listed $2.62 | 50.00 | brocod.ing lower by 84% |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 3.06listed $3.00 | 0.234listed $0.214 | 10.00 | brocod.ing lower by 92% |
| GPT-6 Astra | 20.39listed $20.00 | 1.05listed $0.958 | 50.00 | brocod.ing lower by 95% |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 4.89listed $4.80 | 0.490listed $0.447 | 20.00 | brocod.ing lower by 90% |
This is an arithmetic ratio. It is not an accusation against the vendor, and a lower public source not yet indexed here may exist.
FAQ
- Which is cheaper, apidock.ai or brocod.ing?
- It depends on the model. Of the 5 mainstream models both sell, apidock.ai is lower on 0, brocod.ing is lower on 5 (e.g. Claude Opus 5.5、Claude Fable 5.1、GPT-6.1 Sol), and 0 are about the same. We only show effective prices and make no recommendation.
- How are the effective prices at apidock.ai and brocod.ing calculated?
- Effective = listed price × group multiplier × top-up rate ÷ FX (today 6.67). apidock.ai: top-up rate ¥6.80 per $1, group default ×1.00; brocod.ing: top-up rate ¥7.30 per $1, group default ×1.00. A site's own page may show a member-group price by default.
- Which is easier to reach, apidock.ai or brocod.ing?
- Our probes over the last 24 hours: apidock.ai reachable 100%, median time to first byte 1493 ms; brocod.ing reachable 100%, median time to first byte 2223 ms. Reachability only says whether it can be reached, not model quality.
- Can you still sign up at both sites?
- apidock.ai: Open; brocod.ing: Open.
- How often is this data updated?
- Panel prices are fetched daily and reachability is probed hourly; every price can be traced to a fetch snapshot on each site's page.
More comparisonsapidock.ai vs runapi.coapidock.ai vs aigcbest.topapidock.ai vs runapi.hostapidock.ai vs apilio.aiapidock.ai vs apiok.ccapidock.ai vs cherryin.netapidock.ai vs magic666.topapidock.ai vs gptapi.asiabrocod.ing vs runapi.cobrocod.ing vs aigcbest.topAll comparisons →
One email a week
Subscribe to the Sinan weekly
This week's rankings, the price index, mainstream price changes, newly indexed and unreachable sites. Measurements only, no recommendations; unsubscribe any time.
Clear direction, grounded judgement.