Data 2026-11-01 05:35 · USD/CNY 6.67
中文
← Sinan Lab › Image · Video › PixVerse
Video · model family

Relay effective prices for PixVerse

Per-second / per-call effective prices for PixVerse at 5 relay sites. No official reference price yet, so quotes are listed without ratios. Featured versions: —. Data 2026-11-01; every number carries a fetch snapshot.

Explore in the image · video ledger →
Official reference price
—
Official pricing not integrated
Relay sites
5 sites · 25 rows
Featured —; 0 older-version rows collapsed
Effective price range
$0.0200 – $0.1120
$/s, median $0.0778
Within range
0 sites
Below cost floor 0 · unverified 0

Featured versions · 25 rows

Relay sitesVersionEffectiveRatioBand
kie.ai
pixverse-v6 · Text /Image to Video, 360p(no audio) · listed $0.020/s
—0.020$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6 · Text /Image to Video, 540p(no audio) · listed $0.028/s
—0.028$/s—No reference
magic666.top
PixVerse-v6 · listed $0.205/s (site credits)
—0.031$/s—No reference
magic666.top
PixVerse-c1 · listed $0.235/s (site credits)
—0.035$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6-max · Text /Image to Video, 360p(with audio) · listed $0.036/s
—0.036$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6 · Text /Image to Video, 720p(no audio) · listed $0.036/s
—0.036$/s—No reference
magic666.top
PixVerse-v5.6 · listed $0.245/s (site credits)
—0.037$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6-max · Text /Image to Video, 540p(with audio) · listed $0.044/s
—0.044$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6-max · Text /Image to Video, 720p(with audio) · listed $0.060/s
—0.060$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6 · Text /Image to Video, 1080p(no audio) · listed $0.072/s
—0.072$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-c1-1080p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-v6-1080p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-v6-540p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-v6-720p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-v5.6-540p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-v5.6-720p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-c1-720p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-v5.6-1080p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
magic666.top
pixverse-c1-540p · listed $0.557/s (site credits)
—0.084$/s—No reference
kie.ai
pixverse-v6-max · Text /Image to Video, 1080p(with audio) · listed $0.112/s
—0.112$/s—No reference
apilio.ai
pixverse-video-v1 · listed $0.800/call (site credits)
—0.120$/call · no published default duration for this family, not converted to per second—No reference
apilio.ai
pixverse-video · listed $0.800/call (site credits)
—0.120$/call · no published default duration for this family, not converted to per second—No reference
kg-api.cloud
pixverse-video-v1 · listed $0.800/call (site credits)
—0.216$/call · no published default duration for this family, not converted to per second—No reference
kg-api.cloud
pixverse-video · listed $0.800/call (site credits)
—0.216$/call · no published default duration for this family, not converted to per second—No reference
proaiapi.tech
pixverse-video · listed $10.00/call (site credits)
—1.50$/call · no published default duration for this family, not converted to per second—No reference

FAQ

What is the official API price for PixVerse?
The vendor has not published a scrapeable pricing page, or we haven't integrated it yet; until then relay quotes are listed without ratios.
What unit are the prices in this table?
Video is always expressed per second ($/s) and images per image ($/image), the same way across the site. Sites that already quote per second are used as is; where the model name states a duration (e.g. veo3.1-8s) we convert by it; where neither is available we convert by the family's published default duration and mark that row. Families with no published default duration are not converted and only the raw quote is shown. The conversion is arithmetic; it does not mean the site actually generates clips of that length.
Why feature only the latest two generations?
Older versions usually have lower official prices, so comparing an old-version quote against a new-version reference would distort the ratio; older entries are collapsed below and labelled with their version.
This is an arithmetic ratio. It is not an accusation against the vendor, and a lower public source not yet indexed here may exist.
One email a week

Subscribe to the Sinan weekly

This week's rankings, the price index, mainstream price changes, newly indexed and unreachable sites. Measurements only, no recommendations; unsubscribe any time.

SinanLabClear direction, grounded judgement.